Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

C2C - Close to ConsumerC2C - Close to Consumer
VS
VFS GlobalVFS Global
C2C - Close to Consumer

C2C - Close to Consumer

R. Bela Cintra, 643, São Paulo, 01310-000, BR

Last Update: 26/01/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

A C2C – Close to Consumer é especializada na contratação e administração inteligente de mão de obra para as áreas de marketing, trade marketing e vendas. Desenvolvemos soluções personalizadas para quem busca competitividade no mercado, gerando resultados efetivos.

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:528
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VFS Global

VFS Global

Unit 201, Level 2, Gate Village 8, DIFC, P.O. Box 114100, Dubai, AE

Last Update: 16/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.vfsglobal.com
706/1000Moderate

As the global leader in trusted technology services, empowering secure mobility for governments and citizens, VFS Global embraces technological innovation including Generative AI to support governments and diplomatic missions worldwide. VFS Global continuously transform...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,742
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
C2C - Close to Consumer

C2C - Close to Consumer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VFS Global

VFS Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C2C - Close to Consumer in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

VFS Global has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - C2C - Close to Consumer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C2C - Close to Consumer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VFS Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VFS Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
C2C - Close to Consumer

C2C - Close to Consumer

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VFS Global

VFS Global

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VFS1784205219

FAQ

Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer company and VFS Global company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer and VFS Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer and VFS Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - C2C - Close to Consumer or VFS Global ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - C2C - Close to Consumer or VFS Global ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer and VFS Global, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between C2C - Close to Consumer and VFS Global, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA