Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

C-Track Geosciences and GeoinformaticsC-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics
VS
ConocoPhillipsConocoPhillips
C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics

C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics

S-03, 2nd Floor, Haware centurion, Navi Mumbai, 400706, IN

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.ctracksurveys.com
688/1000Weak

C-Track is an ISO 9001:2015 compliant organisation. C-Track delivers engineering-grade marine, hydrographic, geophysical, geotechnical, and geospatial intelligence through high-resolution surveys, advanced underwater and subsurface sensing, precise positioning, and rigo...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
ConocoPhillips

ConocoPhillips

925 N Eldridge Pkwy, Houston, 77079, US

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile

We are a global oil and gas company tasked with an important job—to safely find and deliver energy for the world. We’re experts in what we do—from the well site to the office. Across our operations and activities in 13 countries, we never forget our responsibility to ...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:16,502
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics

C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ConocoPhillips

ConocoPhillips

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics has 57.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ConocoPhillips in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ConocoPhillips (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ConocoPhillips cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics

C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
C-T1788405973
ConocoPhillips

ConocoPhillips

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics company and ConocoPhillips company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics and ConocoPhillips, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics and ConocoPhillips, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics or ConocoPhillips ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics or ConocoPhillips ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics and ConocoPhillips, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between C-Track Geosciences and Geoinformatics and ConocoPhillips, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8