Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

C&W ServicesC&W Services
VS
Ambius United KingdomAmbius United Kingdom
C&W Services

C&W Services

140 Kendrick Street, Needham, 02494, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cwservices.com
770/1000Fair

Raising the Value of Facilities Services. C&W Services is a leading integrated facility services provider that helps clients drive down facility operating expenses, increase facility efficiency and uptime, make strategic business decisions, and create a positive occup...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:4,271
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ambius United Kingdom

Ambius United Kingdom

Rentokil Initial, Crawley, RH10 9PY, GB

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ambius.co.uk/
775/1000Fair

Ambius us the world's largest provider of plants, replica foliage and flowers for commercial environments. We not only specialise in designing, installing and servicing acclimatised, interior plants and pots, but also offer additional services such as exterior landsca...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:12,783
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
C&W Services

C&W Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ambius United Kingdom

Ambius United Kingdom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C&W Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambius United Kingdom in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - C&W Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C&W Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ambius United Kingdom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambius United Kingdom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
C&W Services

C&W Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ambius United Kingdom

Ambius United Kingdom

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between C&W Services company and Ambius United Kingdom company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between C&W Services and Ambius United Kingdom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between C&W Services and Ambius United Kingdom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - C&W Services or Ambius United Kingdom ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - C&W Services or Ambius United Kingdom ?
Between C&W Services and Ambius United Kingdom, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between C&W Services and Ambius United Kingdom, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
C&w-services vs Ambius-united-kingdom - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo