Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

C&M Engineering S.A.C&M Engineering S.A.
VS
Johnson ControlsJohnson Controls
C&M Engineering S.A.

C&M Engineering S.A.

None, None, Athens, None, gr, None

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
569/1000Very Poor

C&M Engineering is a leading independent consultancy and engineering firm offering an integrated package of services which includes: - Project & Program Management - Design & Engineering - Permitting - Land Easement & Acquisition - Tendering & Contracting - Constr...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:67
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Johnson Controls

Johnson Controls

Milwaukee, Cork, Ireland, IE, T12 X8N6

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

At Johnson Controls, we transform the environments where people live, work, learn and play. As the global leader in smart, healthy and sustainable buildings, our mission is to reimagine the performance of buildings to serve people, places and the planet. Building on ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:60,211
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
C&M Engineering S.A.

C&M Engineering S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson Controls

Johnson Controls

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C&M Engineering S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson Controls in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - C&M Engineering S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C&M Engineering S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson Controls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson Controls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
C&M Engineering S.A.

C&M Engineering S.A.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
C&M946080725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
C&M416092125
Johnson Controls

Johnson Controls

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
JOH4502045100625
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
JOH174511023

FAQ

Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. company and Johnson Controls company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. and Johnson Controls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. and Johnson Controls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - C&M Engineering S.A. or Johnson Controls ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - C&M Engineering S.A. or Johnson Controls ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. and Johnson Controls, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between C&M Engineering S.A. and Johnson Controls, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
C&m-engineering-s-a- vs Johnson-controls - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo