Comparison Overview
C&M Engineering S.A.
C&M Engineering S.A.
None, None, Athens, None, gr, None
Last Update: 21/03/2026
C&M Engineering is a leading independent consultancy and engineering firm offering an integrated package of services which includes: - Project & Program Management - Design & Engineering - Permitting - Land Easement & Acquisition - Tendering & Contracting - Constr...
Danfoss
Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430
Last Update: 12/10/2026
Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machine...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
C&M Engineering S.A.
Danfoss
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for C&M Engineering S.A. in 2026.
Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Danfoss has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - C&M Engineering S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
C&M Engineering S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
C&M Engineering S.A.
Danfoss
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.