Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Byte Federal, IncByte Federal, Inc
VS
CreditEaseCreditEase
Byte Federal, Inc

Byte Federal, Inc

2389 East Venice Ave, Venice, 34292, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.bytefederal.com
633/1000Poor

ByteFederal, Inc is one of the largest Bitcoin ATM operators in the US. We specialize in operating Bitcoin ATMs, training, support and software development for the Bitcoin ecosystem. We're working to enable circular economies with non-custodial wallets & merchant POS...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
CreditEase

CreditEase

朝阳区建国路88号SOHO现代城16层, 北京, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.creditease.com
772/1000Fair

Founded in 2006, CreditEase is a Beijing-based world-leading FinTech conglomerate in China. It specializes in inclusive finance and wealth management with a dominant position in credit technology, wealth management technology, insurance technology, etc. Main business se...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:16,932
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Byte Federal, Inc

Byte Federal, Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CreditEase

CreditEase

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Byte Federal, Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CreditEase in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Byte Federal, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Byte Federal, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CreditEase (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CreditEase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Byte Federal, Inc

Byte Federal, Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BYT1007091725
🔒 Incident : Breach
BYT651072925
CreditEase

CreditEase

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc company and CreditEase company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc and CreditEase, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc and CreditEase, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Byte Federal, Inc or CreditEase ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Byte Federal, Inc or CreditEase ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc and CreditEase, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Byte Federal, Inc and CreditEase, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2