Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.
VS
STRABAGSTRABAG
BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.

BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.

26/F, Two Harbour Square, 180 Wai Yip Street, Kwun Tong, undefined, undefined, HK

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bymehk.com
752/1000Fair

BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. is a full-service building services specialist firm with an established presence around the region. We were founded in 1990, as part of Dragages Hong Kong, a leading building and civil engineering company in Asia, operating under the gl...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:112
Subsidiaries:100
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
STRABAG

STRABAG

Ortenburger Strasse 27, Spittal/Drau, 9800, AT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://karriere.strabag.com
783/1000Fair

At STRABAG around 86,000 people working on progress at more than 2,400 locations worldwide. Uniqueness and individual strengths characterise both our projects and each of us as individuals. Whether its building construction, civil engineering, road construction, undergr...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:21,228
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.

BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
STRABAG

STRABAG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STRABAG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - STRABAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STRABAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.

BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
STRABAG

STRABAG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. company and STRABAG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. and STRABAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. and STRABAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. or STRABAG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. or STRABAG ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. and STRABAG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BYME Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. and STRABAG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8