Comparison Overview
VolkerWessels BVGO-ICT

VolkerWessels BVGO-ICT
Reggesingel 4, Rijssen, Overijssel, 7461, NL
Last Update: 14/11/2025
Bij VolkerWessels kunnen we met trots zeggen: wie maakt, bouwt en geeft daarmee vorm aan de toekomst. Daarom gaan we altijd voor een leefomgeving waarin volgende generaties gezond en gelukkig kunnen leven, wonen en werken! Vraagstukken rond klimaatverandering en energie...

SONDA
Teatinos 500, Santiago, CL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By u...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

VolkerWessels BVGO-ICT







SONDA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VolkerWessels BVGO-ICT in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2026.
Incident History - VolkerWessels BVGO-ICT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VolkerWessels BVGO-ICT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

VolkerWessels BVGO-ICT

SONDA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.