Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)
VS
SiemensSiemens
Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)

Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)

台北市南港區成功路一段32號, Taipei, 115, TW

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.burkert.com
745/1000Moderate

Burkert Taiwan Ltd. / 德商 台灣寶帝股份有限公司 ■ 在全球流體控制系統領域中處於領先地位 ■ 已在流體控制行業耕耘了近 80 年 ■ 經驗豐富且值得信賴的全球供應商 BÜRKERT 的產品應用廣泛且符合國際規範,涵蓋各個行業應用 : ■ CIP/SIP清潔系統 ■ 充填、混合及批量控制 ■ 冷卻控制 ■ 水質分析 ■ 膜應用 ■ 濃度控制 ■ 表面加工處理 ■ 蒸氣控制及微量控制 ■ 取樣分析 我們提供的數位化產品可透過數據蒐集及遠端監控,幫助您掌握製造過程,提升安全性、生產效率及品質管理。 尤其是預測...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Siemens

Siemens

Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 1, Munich, 80333, DE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.siemens.com
784/1000Fair

Siemens AG (Berlin and Munich) is a leading technology company focused on industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare. The company’s purpose is to create technology to transform the everyday, for everyone. By combining the real and the digital worlds, Siemens emp...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:255,207
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)

Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Siemens

Siemens

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Siemens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)

Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Siemens

Siemens

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DIM4992449100425
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SIE903031625

FAQ

Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) company and Siemens company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) and Siemens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) and Siemens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) or Siemens ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) or Siemens ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) and Siemens, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Burkert Taiwan (台灣寶帝股份有限公司) and Siemens, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56082
SUMMARY

Capgo (Cap-go/capgo) before 12.128.2 contains an improper access control vulnerability in the SECURITY DEFINER PostgREST RPC function public.record_build_time, which is granted to the anon role and callable with only the public Supabase publishable (sb_publishable_*) anon key. An unauthenticated attacker can insert rows into public.build_logs for arbitrary organizations and, because the function uses ON CONFLICT (build_id, org_id) DO UPDATE, can overwrite existing usage/billing records by reusing the same build_id for a target org. This enables cross-tenant tampering of billing build logs and financial-impact denial of service by inflating billable build time.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56081
SUMMARY

Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication logic flaw that lets an attacker register and control an account bound to a victim's email address before that email is verified. By enabling two-factor authentication on the pre-registered account, the attacker gains control over the account claimed under the victim's identity, allowing them to read and modify its state and enforce organization-level policies, while the legitimate user is denied access to the account tied to their own email.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56080
SUMMARY

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a flaw in the Enforce Password Policy feature: after a Super Admin enables the policy and successfully changes their password to a compliant one, the backend does not update the password-compliance state. As a result, the backend continues to treat the account as non-compliant and repeatedly forces password-reset prompts, permanently locking the Super Admin out of organization access (organization lockout / denial of service) despite valid authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-56079
SUMMARY

Capgo before 12.128.2 contains a cross-tenant authorization bypass vulnerability in PostgREST endpoints that allows org-scoped read API keys to access other tenants' webhook secrets and delivery logs. Attackers can query the webhooks and webhook_deliveries endpoints to exfiltrate HMAC signing secrets and delivery payloads, enabling forged webhook events against victim organizations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56073
SUMMARY

Cap-go before 12.128.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in OTP verification that allows attackers to bypass email verification by modifying server responses. Attackers can intercept OTP verification requests and manipulate HTTP responses to falsely mark verification successful, enabling unauthorized 2FA enablement and account takeover.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-19
UPDATED
Date2026-06-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9