Comparison Overview
Burger King Brasil
Burger King Brasil
Alameda Tocantins, Barueri, Sao Paulo, 06455-020, BR
Last Update: 21/03/2026
Operada pela ZAMP®, a marca BURGER KING® está no Brasil desde 2004, quando inauguramos nosso primeiro restaurante no Shopping Ibirapuera, mas foi em 2011 que iniciamos a nossa operação própria no país, através de uma joint venture entre Vinci Partners e 3G Capital. De...
Panera Bread
1400 S Highway Dr, Fenton, 63026, US
Last Update: 27/04/2026
Our first bakery-cafe opened in 1987, founded with a secret sourdough starter and the belief that the best part of bread is sharing it. That vision led to the invention of the Fast Casual category with Panera at the forefront, centered around our delicious menu of chef-...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Burger King Brasil
Panera Bread
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burger King Brasil in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
Panera Bread has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Burger King Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Burger King Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Panera Bread (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Panera Bread cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Burger King Brasil
Panera Bread
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A flaw has been found in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. This issue affects the function system of the file /cgi-bin/mbox-config?section=ping_config of the component API Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument destination causes os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability was detected in activepieces up to 0.83.0. This vulnerability affects the function handleUrlFile in the library packages/server/engine/src/lib/variables/processors/file.ts of the component File URL Handler. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A security vulnerability has been detected in Radware Cyber Controller up to 10.11.0. This affects an unknown part of the component HTML Report Generation. The manipulation leads to HTML injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A weakness has been identified in kortix-ai suna up to 0.8.38. Affected by this issue is the function router.replace/router.push of the file apps/frontend/src/app/auth/page.tsx of the component Auth Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument returnURL can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 0.8.39 can resolve this issue. This patch is called f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The researcher explains: "The issue was fixed in v0.8.39 without notifying the wider user base via a security disclosure."
- https://gist.github.com/TrebledJ/fe7241910ac0aaeff86243fc88e9ffed
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/commit/f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/releases/tag/v0.8.39
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-12811
- https://vuldb.com/submit/837175
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605/cti
A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6478AC V2 1.23. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mp of the file /goform/mp of the component POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument command results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.