Comparison Overview
Burger King Brasil
Burger King Brasil
Alameda Tocantins, Barueri, Sao Paulo, 06455-020, BR
Last Update: 21/03/2026
Operada pela ZAMP®, a marca BURGER KING® está no Brasil desde 2004, quando inauguramos nosso primeiro restaurante no Shopping Ibirapuera, mas foi em 2011 que iniciamos a nossa operação própria no país, através de uma joint venture entre Vinci Partners e 3G Capital. De...
In-N-Out Burger
4199 Campus Drive, Irvine, 92612, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
In-N-Out Burger was founded in 1948 by Harry and Esther Snyder in Baldwin Park, California, and remains privately owned and operated. Under the direction of the Snyder family, the company has opened restaurants throughout California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Texas, Orego...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Burger King Brasil
In-N-Out Burger
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burger King Brasil in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for In-N-Out Burger in 2026.
Incident History - Burger King Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Burger King Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - In-N-Out Burger (X = Date, Y = Severity)
In-N-Out Burger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Burger King Brasil
In-N-Out Burger
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.