Comparison Overview

Bureau Veritas Latvia

VS

WM

Bureau Veritas Latvia

Duntes ielas 17a, Rīga, undefined, LV-1005, LV
Last Update: 2024-11-07 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
https://www.bureauveritas.lv/

Strong

Bureau Veritas atbalsta Jūs – mūsu klientus Jums piederošo resursu, produktu, infrastruktūras iegādes, izmantošanas, pilnveides, uzturēšanas periodā, palīdzot kvalitātes nodrošināšanā, izmaksu samazināšanā, efektivitātes paaugstināšanā un atbildīgākas, ilgtspējīgākas kultūras veicināšanā. Latvijā uzņēmumam Bureau Veritas ir vairāk kā 160 gadu ilga vēsture. Jau 1858. gadā Rīgā tika atvērta pirmā Bureau Veritas pārstāvniecība, kas darbojās līdz pat 1940. gadam. Atkārtoti Bureau Veritas savu biroju Rīgā atvēra 1996. gadā pēc valsts neatkarības atjaunošanas.

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

WM

800 Capitol St, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas, US, 77002
Last Update: 2025-08-20 (UTC)

Fair

Between 500 and 600
http://www.wm.com

WM is North America's leading provider of integrated environmental solutions. We partner with our customers and communities to manage and reduce waste from collection to disposal while recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy. We are on a quest for environmental performance, a mission to maximize resource value, while minimizing – and even eliminating – environmental impact so that both our economy and our environment can thrive. WM tailors its services to meet the needs of each customer group and to ensure consistent, superior service at the local level. Headquartered in Houston, the company serves nearly 20 million municipal, commercial, industrial, and residential customers through a network of 367 collection operations, 355 transfer stations, 273 active landfill disposal sites, 16 waste-to-energy plants, 104 recycling plants, and 111 beneficial-use landfill gas projects.

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 26,374
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bureau-veritas-latvia.jpeg
Bureau Veritas Latvia
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/waste-management.jpeg
WM
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Bureau Veritas Latvia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bureau Veritas Latvia in 2025.

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WM in 2025.

Incident History — Bureau Veritas Latvia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bureau Veritas Latvia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bureau-veritas-latvia.jpeg
Bureau Veritas Latvia
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/waste-management.jpeg
WM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bureau Veritas Latvia company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to WM company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bureau Veritas Latvia company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas WM company has not reported any.

In the current year, WM company and Bureau Veritas Latvia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WM company nor Bureau Veritas Latvia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WM company nor Bureau Veritas Latvia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Bureau Veritas Latvia company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while WM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bureau Veritas Latvia company nor WM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Bureau Veritas Latvia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to WM company.

WM company employs more people globally than Bureau Veritas Latvia company, reflecting its scale as a Environmental Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. In versions prior to 3.0.8, WriteFileTool and ReadFileTool in Flowise do not restrict file path access, allowing authenticated attackers to exploit this vulnerability to read and write arbitrary files to any path in the file system, potentially leading to remote command execution. Flowise 3.0.8 fixes this vulnerability.

Published
Date
2025-10-08
Updated
Date
2025-10-08
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

A flaw has been found in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file /pages/supplier_add.php. Executing manipulation of the argument supp_email can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-10-08
Updated
Date
2025-10-08
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in code-projects E-Commerce Website 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /pages/product_add.php. Performing manipulation of the argument prod_name results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-10-08
Updated
Date
2025-10-08
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Voting System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/voters_add.php. Such manipulation of the argument photo leads to unrestricted upload. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-10-08
Updated
Date
2025-10-08
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MongoDB Connector for BI installation via MSI on Windows leaves ACLs unset on custom install directories allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects MongoDB Connector for BI: from 2.0.0 through 2.14.24.

Published
Date
2025-10-08
Updated
Date
2025-10-08
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References