Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bupa AustraliaBupa Australia
VS
Emory HealthcareEmory Healthcare
Bupa Australia

Bupa Australia

Melbourne, 3000, AU

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bupa.com.au/
764/1000Fair

Bupa is a health and care company committed to helping our customers live longer, healthier, happier lives and making a better world. We offer a broad range of services, including aged care and retirement, dental, optical, health insurance, and community wellbeing initi...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:353
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Emory Healthcare

Emory Healthcare

Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, 30322, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
737/1000Moderate

Emory Healthcare is the most comprehensive health care system in Georgia. We offer 11 hospitals, the Emory Clinic, more than 250 provider locations, and more than 2,800 physicians specializing in 70 different medical subspecialties. Meaning we can provide treatments and...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:16,617
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bupa Australia

Bupa Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Emory Healthcare

Emory Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bupa Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emory Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bupa Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bupa Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Emory Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emory Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bupa Australia

Bupa Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Emory Healthcare

Emory Healthcare

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
EMO729051525
🔒 Incident : Breach
EMO118251222

FAQ

Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bupa Australia company and Emory Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bupa Australia and Emory Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bupa Australia and Emory Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bupa Australia or Emory Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bupa Australia or Emory Healthcare ?
Between Bupa Australia and Emory Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bupa Australia and Emory Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2