Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BunkhouseBunkhouse
VS
Holiday Inn ExpressHoliday Inn Express
Bunkhouse

Bunkhouse

400 Josephine St, Austin, 78704, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
714/1000Moderate

Bunkhouse has a reputation for building memorable experiences that offer more than just a good night's sleep and a great cup of coffee. Passion for design, tireless attention to detail and a commitment to creating authentic culture have earned our properties a unique pl...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:129
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Holiday Inn Express

Holiday Inn Express

Global, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

An IHG hotel. IHG Hotels & Resorts [LON:IHG, NYSE:IHG (ADRs)] is a global hospitality company, with a purpose to provide True Hospitality for Good. At Holiday Inn Express, we strive to make every interaction you have with us simple, smart and refreshingly engaging. W...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:22,428
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bunkhouse

Bunkhouse

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Holiday Inn Express

Holiday Inn Express

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bunkhouse in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holiday Inn Express in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bunkhouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bunkhouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Holiday Inn Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holiday Inn Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bunkhouse

Bunkhouse

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BUN945072425
Holiday Inn Express

Holiday Inn Express

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bunkhouse company and Holiday Inn Express company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bunkhouse and Holiday Inn Express, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bunkhouse and Holiday Inn Express, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bunkhouse or Holiday Inn Express ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bunkhouse or Holiday Inn Express ?
Between Bunkhouse and Holiday Inn Express, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bunkhouse and Holiday Inn Express, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2