Comparison Overview

Swiss Federal Administration

VS

UK Home Office

Swiss Federal Administration

Eigerstrasse 71, Bern, 3003, CH
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stelle.admin.ch

Seven departments, the Federal Chancellery and around 70 administrative units make up the Federal Administration. With around 38,000 employees, we are one of the largest employers in Switzerland. Everyone who works for the Federal Administration actively contributes to Switzerland's well-being and shapes the future of our country. We are as varied as Switzerland itself – we stand for active diversity and inclusion. Our employees come from all over the country and the Federal Administration is present throughout Switzerland. With us, you can expect diverse, challenging and unique tasks in all kinds of subject areas and specialist fields. As a modern employer, the Federal Administration enables its employees to combine work and private life with flexible forms of work and promotes their personal development with practical training and continuing professional development. * Vacancies in the administrative units can be found on their LinkedIn pages or at stelle.admin.ch.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 24,156
Subsidiaries: 68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

UK Home Office

2 Marsham Street, London, GB, SW1P 4DF
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office

At the Home Office, we help to ensure that the country is safe and secure. We’ve been looking after UK citizens since 1782. We are responsible for: - working on the problems caused by illegal drug use - shaping the alcohol strategy, policy and licensing conditions - keeping the United Kingdom safe from the threat of terrorism - reducing and preventing crime, and ensuring people feel safe in their homes and communities - securing the UK border and controlling immigration - considering applications to enter and stay in the UK - issuing passports and visas - supporting visible, responsible and accountable policing by empowering the public and freeing up the police to fight crime - fire prevention and rescue These organisations are all part of the Home Office: - Border Force - HM Passport Office (HMPO) - Immigration Enforcement - UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI)

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 17,331
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bundesverwaltung.jpeg
Swiss Federal Administration
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-home-office.jpeg
UK Home Office
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Swiss Federal Administration
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UK Home Office
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swiss Federal Administration in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UK Home Office in 2026.

Incident History — Swiss Federal Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swiss Federal Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UK Home Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UK Home Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bundesverwaltung.jpeg
Swiss Federal Administration
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-home-office.jpeg
UK Home Office
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2010
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error, Insecure Data Handling, Improper Access Controls, Accidental Publication
Motivation: Negligence, Operational Failures, Potential Espionage (for Afghan/PSNI breaches), Financial Gain (for dark web sales of leaked data)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UK Home Office company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swiss Federal Administration company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UK Home Office company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Swiss Federal Administration company has not reported any.

In the current year, UK Home Office company and Swiss Federal Administration company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UK Home Office company nor Swiss Federal Administration company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UK Home Office company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Swiss Federal Administration company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UK Home Office company nor Swiss Federal Administration company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration company nor UK Home Office company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration nor UK Home Office holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Swiss Federal Administration company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UK Home Office company.

Swiss Federal Administration company employs more people globally than UK Home Office company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration nor UK Home Office holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration nor UK Home Office holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration nor UK Home Office holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration nor UK Home Office holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration nor UK Home Office holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Swiss Federal Administration nor UK Home Office holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References