Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)
VS
Texas Health and Human ServicesTexas Health and Human Services
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)

Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)

Chausseestraße 96-99A, 10115 Berlin, Berlin, 10115, DE

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://bnd.bund.de/
735/1000Moderate

Der BND ist der Auslandsnachrichtendienst der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Impressum: https://bnd.bund.de/social

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:156
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

4601 W Guadalupe St. , Austin, 78751, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://hhs.texas.gov
779/1000Fair

Overview The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is an agency within the Texas Health and Human Services System. In September 2016, Texas began transforming how it delivers health and human services to qualified Texans, with a goal of making the Health and...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10,817
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)

Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Health and Human Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Texas Health and Human Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health and Human Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)

Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
WHABUNSIG1773750470
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA