Comparison Overview
Buffalo Wild Wings

Buffalo Wild Wings
3 Glenlake Pkwy NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30328, US
Last Update: 29/11/2025
Buffalo Wild Wings, founded in 1982, is the largest sports bar brand in the United States. Globally, BWW has more than 1,200 restaurants in 10 countries. Buffalo Wild Wings is part of the Inspire Brands family of restaurants. For more information, visit BuffaloWildWings...

Jack in the Box
9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, San Diego, California, US, 92123
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Buffalo Wild Wings







Jack in the Box






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Buffalo Wild Wings in 2026.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jack in the Box in 2026.
Incident History - Buffalo Wild Wings (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Buffalo Wild Wings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jack in the Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jack in the Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Buffalo Wild Wings

Jack in the Box
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.