Comparison Overview
Buffalo State University

Buffalo State University
1300 Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, NY, 14222, US
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Buffalo State is committed to the intellectual, personal, and professional growth of its students, faculty, staff, and alumni. The college’s mission is to empower students to succeed and to inspire a lifelong passion for learning. Buffalo State is dedicated to excellenc...

Uppsala University
Dag Hammarskjölds väg 7, Uppsala, Uppsala län, SE, 75105
Last Update: 05/05/2026
Uppsala University strives to bring new perspectives to the basic questions of science as well as knowledge contributing to sustainable development and human health. We offer 39 different master programmes covering over 60 different specialisations. In Uppsala you walk ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Buffalo State University







Uppsala University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Buffalo State University in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Uppsala University has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Buffalo State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Buffalo State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Uppsala University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Uppsala University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Buffalo State University

Uppsala University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.