Comparison Overview
Buffalo State University

Buffalo State University
1300 Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, NY, 14222, US
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Buffalo State is committed to the intellectual, personal, and professional growth of its students, faculty, staff, and alumni. The college’s mission is to empower students to succeed and to inspire a lifelong passion for learning. Buffalo State is dedicated to excellenc...

University of Pittsburgh
4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15260
Last Update: 04/04/2026
The University of Pittsburgh is a top-ranked, public institution in Pennsylvania and a member of the Association of American Universities of leading research universities. With our discoveries, we are recognized as one of the most innovative universities in the world. W...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Buffalo State University







University of Pittsburgh






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Buffalo State University in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Pittsburgh in 2026.
Incident History - Buffalo State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Buffalo State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Pittsburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Pittsburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Buffalo State University

University of Pittsburgh
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.