Comparison Overview
BT for global business

BT for global business
BT Centre, London, undefined, EC1A 7AJ, GB
Last Update: 03/01/2026
We serve global multinational organisations around the world with our security, cloud and networking services. We can help your organisation to move to the cloud; turn collaboration into part of your culture; improve your contact centres; transform your customer servic...

Proximus Group
Boulevard du Roi Albert II 27, Brussels, 1030, BE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Proximus Group is a provider of future-proof connectivity, IT and digital services, headquartered in Brussels. The Group is actively engaged in building a connected world that people trust, so society blooms. The Domestic segment is focused on providing state-of-the ar...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BT for global business







Proximus Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BT for global business in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Proximus Group in 2026.
Incident History - BT for global business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BT for global business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Proximus Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Proximus Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BT for global business

Proximus Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.