Comparison Overview
BT for global business

BT for global business
BT Centre, London, undefined, EC1A 7AJ, GB
Last Update: 03/01/2026
We serve global multinational organisations around the world with our security, cloud and networking services. We can help your organisation to move to the cloud; turn collaboration into part of your culture; improve your contact centres; transform your customer servic...

Airtel Africa
The Oval, Ringroad Parklands, Nairobi, 00100, KE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Airtel Africa is a leading provider of telecommunications and mobile money services, with a presence in 14 countries in Africa, primarily in East Africa and Central and West Africa. Airtel Africa offers an integrated suite of telecommunications solutions to its subscri...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BT for global business







Airtel Africa






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BT for global business in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Airtel Africa in 2026.
Incident History - BT for global business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BT for global business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Airtel Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Airtel Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BT for global business

Airtel Africa
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.