Comparison Overview
BT Business

BT Business
1 Braham Street, Whitechapel, E1 8EE, GB
Last Update: 20/02/2026
BT Business is the UK B2B division of BT Group, and we mean business for 1.2 million business and public sector customers. Our customers range from big household names and government departments, right through to small businesses and new start-ups. But regardless of s...

EchoStar Corporation
9601 S Meridian Blvd, Englewood, 80112, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
EchoStar Corporation (Nasdaq: SATS) is a premier provider of technology, networking services, television entertainment and connectivity, offering consumer, enterprise, operator and government solutions worldwide under its EchoStar®, Boost Mobile®, Sling TV, DISH TV, Hug...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BT Business







EchoStar Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BT Business in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for EchoStar Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - BT Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BT Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - EchoStar Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
EchoStar Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BT Business

EchoStar Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.