Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BSH Home Appliances TaiwanBSH Home Appliances Taiwan
VS
Vedanta GroupVedanta Group
BSH Home Appliances Taiwan

BSH Home Appliances Taiwan

內湖區洲子街107號, 台北市, 114, TW

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bosch-home.com.tw
761/1000Fair

BSH Home Appliances Group is one of the world's leading companies in its sector and the largest home appliances manufacturer in Europe. Alongside the global brands Bosch and Siemens, as well as Gaggenau and Neff, the portfolio also includes the local brands Thermador, ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

Vedanta Resources, London, GB

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

We operate on the belief that our people are our core assets and we consistently endeavour towards developing their potential to be our future leaders and key employees. We currently operate in India, South Africa, Liberia and Namibia, through our various subsidiaries. ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:18,513
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BSH Home Appliances Taiwan

BSH Home Appliances Taiwan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BSH Home Appliances Taiwan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Vedanta Group has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BSH Home Appliances Taiwan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BSH Home Appliances Taiwan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vedanta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vedanta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BSH Home Appliances Taiwan

BSH Home Appliances Taiwan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VEDJAI1776688765

FAQ

Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan and Vedanta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan and Vedanta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BSH Home Appliances Taiwan or Vedanta Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BSH Home Appliances Taiwan or Vedanta Group ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan and Vedanta Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BSH Home Appliances Taiwan and Vedanta Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8