Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bruker • Microbiology & Infection DiagnosticsBruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics
VS
BioconBiocon
Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics

Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics

40 Manning Rd, Billerica, Massachusetts, 01821, US

Last Update: 10/12/2025

View Profile

We are driven by the idea to support researchers, laboratories and healthcare providers in the rapid identification and analysis of microorganisms. With Bruker’s innovative Microbiology & Diagnostic solutions we serve the needs of our customers with instruments and assa...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:158
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Biocon

Biocon

Hosur Road, Electronics City, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560100

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.biocon.com
772/1000Fair

Biocon: Enhancing Global Healthcare Biocon Limited, publicly listed in 2004, is India's largest and fully-integrated, innovation-led biopharmaceutical company. It is an emerging global biopharmaceutical enterprise serving customers in over 120 countries. Driven by a...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:11,558
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics

Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Biocon

Biocon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Biocon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Biocon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Biocon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics

Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Biocon

Biocon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics company and Biocon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics and Biocon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics and Biocon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics or Biocon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics or Biocon ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics and Biocon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bruker • Microbiology & Infection Diagnostics and Biocon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8