Comparison Overview

Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C.

VS

The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC)

Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C.

180 River Road, Summit, New Jersey, 07901, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For more than 25 years, Brown Moskowitz & Kallen has brought business acumen to legal representation, adroitly leading complex commercial transactions and litigations for privately held clients with business interests from local to international. BMK lawyers offer decades of prior experience as both in-house counsel and as practicing attorneys at some of the most prominent law firms in New Jersey and New York. Our business experience is a key asset enabling us to discern our clients’ challenges through the lens of a business owner. More than legal counsel, we are trusted advisors to clients, frequently serving as their outsourced general counsel -- a corporate legal department always on call. BMK attorneys are not merely reactionary legal advisors -- stepping only after challenges arise. We work side-by-side daily with our clients enabling them to plot a course for optimal business success while mitigating risk at every turn. We provide practical legal representation grounded in sound business guidance to help our clients achieve both their short- and long-term goals. We are committed to cost-effective solutions and to providing great value in representing our clients. We have and will continue to augment our suite of services to provide our clients with the expertise needed in today’s demanding, fast-changing, and frequently unpredictable business environment. Whether representing entrepreneurs, start-up companies or a Fortune 500 company engaged in a transaction, dispute or litigation, our focus is singular: “What is in our clients’ business interests?” We welcome the opportunity to meet with you and be of assistance.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC)

9 Gray’s Inn Square, London, undefined, WC1R 5JD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) is a charity that exists to advance education in the sound administration of the law, including by promoting high standards of advocacy and enforcing professional standards of conduct. Whilst having existed for many years as a committee supporting the work of the four Inns of Court, it became a charitable organisation in 2014. COIC, on behalf of the four Inns, also offers responses to various consultations relevant to advocacy and the practice of the Bar. COIC’s mission is to promote the rule of law through excellent advocacy COIC oversees the work of its subsidiary organisations or “operational arms”, namely: The Bar Tribunal and Adjudication Service (BTAS) - BTAS is responsible for appointing and administering disciplinary tribunals for barristers facing charges of professional misconduct and disciplinary cases. It also organises hearings to consider misconduct by student members of, or applicants to, the Inns of Court, and whether this means they are ‘fit and proper’ individuals to become practising barristers. The Inns of Court College of Advocacy (ICCA) - ICCA provides leadership, guidance and coordination in relation to the pursuit of excellence in advocacy, in the UK and internationally. ICCA aims to become the global centre of excellence in the study and practice of advocacy and ethics. Its vision is to become the recognised authority for advocacy training. The Advocates’ Gateway (TAG) - The Advocate's Gateway is a web based resource designed to give advocates free and practical, evidence-based guidance for working with witnesses and defendants with communications needs. TAG aims to: • promote excellence in the justice system's approach to vulnerable witnesses and defendants • collaboratively develop research-led best practice, and • provide educational materials online and via conferences and seminars.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-moskowitz-&-kallen-p.c..jpeg
Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-council-of-the-inns-of-court.jpeg
The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) in 2025.

Incident History — Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-moskowitz-&-kallen-p.c..jpeg
Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-council-of-the-inns-of-court.jpeg
The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company and The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company.

In the current year, The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company and Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company nor Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company nor Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company nor Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) company employs more people globally than Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brown Moskowitz & Kallen, P.C. nor The Council of the Inns of Court (COIC) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X