Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brooklyn CollegeBrooklyn College
VS
University of North TexasUniversity of North Texas
Brooklyn College

Brooklyn College

2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11210, US

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.brooklyn.edu
784/1000Fair

Brooklyn College is an innovative liberal arts institution with a history of more than 90 years of academic excellence. With approximately 18,000 students enrolled in 120 undergraduate and graduate degree programs in the humanities, social, behavioral and natural scienc...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:3,202
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of North Texas

University of North Texas

1155 Union Circle #311277, Denton, Tx, US, 76203-1277

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://unt.edu
800/1000Good

Ranked a Tier One research university by the Carnegie Classification, UNT is the flagship of the UNT System and is located in Denton, Texas. With 242 degree programs and a thriving community of nearly 44,000 students, UNT serves the North Texas region and helps drive th...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:12,902
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brooklyn College

Brooklyn College

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of North Texas

University of North Texas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brooklyn College in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of North Texas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brooklyn College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brooklyn College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of North Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of North Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brooklyn College

Brooklyn College

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of North Texas

University of North Texas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brooklyn College company and University of North Texas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brooklyn College and University of North Texas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brooklyn College and University of North Texas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brooklyn College or University of North Texas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brooklyn College or University of North Texas ?
Between Brooklyn College and University of North Texas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brooklyn College and University of North Texas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA