Comparison Overview
Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions

Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions
225 Liberty St, New York, 10281, US
Last Update: 27/02/2026
Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions partners with financial professionals around the world to connect investors to the innovative solutions, expertise and insights of Brookfield and Oaktree. From public to private markets, and across the liquidity spectrum, we aim to b...

Citi
388 Greenwich Street, New York, 10013, US
Last Update: 20/05/2026
Citi's mission is to serve as a trusted partner to our clients by responsibly providing financial services that enable growth and economic progress. Our core activities are safeguarding assets, lending money, making payments and accessing the capital markets on behalf o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions







Citi






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Citi in 2026.
Incident History - Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Citi (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Citi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Brookfield Oaktree Wealth Solutions

Citi
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.