Comparison Overview
CUNY Bronx Community College

CUNY Bronx Community College
2155 University Ave, Bronx, ny, 10453, US
Last Update: 05/12/2025
For over sixty years, BCC has provided quality education to citizens from the Bronx and beyond. With students from 109 different countries, we are one of the most diverse campuses in New York City. Our welcoming atmosphere and individual support for all of our students ...

Cornell University
Day Hall, Ithaca, NY, US, 14853
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Cornell is a privately endowed research university and a partner of the State University of New York. As the federal land-grant institution in New York State, we have a responsibility—unique within the Ivy League—to make contributions in all fields of knowledge in a man...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CUNY Bronx Community College







Cornell University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CUNY Bronx Community College in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cornell University in 2026.
Incident History - CUNY Bronx Community College (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CUNY Bronx Community College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cornell University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cornell University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CUNY Bronx Community College

Cornell University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.