Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

British Security Industry Association (BSIA)British Security Industry Association (BSIA)
VS
ProsegurProsegur
British Security Industry Association (BSIA)

British Security Industry Association (BSIA)

32 Bedford Row, London, England, GB

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bsia.co.uk
757/1000Fair

The British Security Industry Association is the trade association for the private security industry in the UK. Its members provide over 70% of UK security products and services and adhere to strict quality standards. Formed in 1967, the BSIA provides its members with ...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:46
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prosegur

Prosegur

Pajaritos, 24, Madrid, 28007, ES

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.prosegur.com
762/1000Fair

At Prosegur, being aware of who we are is what defines our identity and commitment. 🌐 We are Prosegur. Leaders in the private security sector for more than 45 years and in more than 30 countries. 💡 We are innovation. We reinvent ourselves, adapt and integrate trends t...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:64,797
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
British Security Industry Association (BSIA)

British Security Industry Association (BSIA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prosegur

Prosegur

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Security Industry Association (BSIA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosegur in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - British Security Industry Association (BSIA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Security Industry Association (BSIA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prosegur (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosegur cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
British Security Industry Association (BSIA)

British Security Industry Association (BSIA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prosegur

Prosegur

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PRO82230423

FAQ

Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) company and Prosegur company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) and Prosegur, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) and Prosegur, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - British Security Industry Association (BSIA) or Prosegur ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - British Security Industry Association (BSIA) or Prosegur ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) and Prosegur, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between British Security Industry Association (BSIA) and Prosegur, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8