Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Baton Rouge International SchoolBaton Rouge International School
VS
NYC Public SchoolsNYC Public Schools
Baton Rouge International School

Baton Rouge International School

5015 Auto Plex Dr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809, US

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.brintl.com/
771/1000Fair

Established in 1999, Baton Rouge International School (BRIS) offers a truly unique opportunity for students to concentrate on academic excellence, leadership skills, multilingualism and global thinking in a nurturing and culturally diverse environment. At BRIS, we car...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NYC Public Schools

NYC Public Schools

52 Chambers, New York, 10007, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://schools.nyc.gov
742/1000Moderate

New York City Public Schools (NYCPS) is the largest public school system in the United States, serving approximately 1 million students across more than 1,600 schools in all five boroughs. Our schools are powered by over 75,000 teachers and thousands of paraprofessional...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:77,240
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Baton Rouge International School

Baton Rouge International School

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NYC Public Schools

NYC Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baton Rouge International School in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NYC Public Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Baton Rouge International School (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baton Rouge International School cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NYC Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NYC Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Baton Rouge International School

Baton Rouge International School

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NYC Public Schools

NYC Public Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NYC2485224102825
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
NYC52725623
🔒 Incident : Breach
NYC2427622

FAQ

Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Baton Rouge International School company and NYC Public Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Baton Rouge International School and NYC Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Baton Rouge International School and NYC Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Baton Rouge International School or NYC Public Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Baton Rouge International School or NYC Public Schools ?
Between Baton Rouge International School and NYC Public Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Baton Rouge International School and NYC Public Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1