Comparison Overview

Brinker International

VS

Jack in the Box

Brinker International

3000 Olympus Blvd, Dallas, Texas, 75019, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Dallas-based Brinker International, Inc. is one of the world’s leading casual dining restaurant companies. Founded in 1975, Brinker owns, operates or franchises more than 1,600 restaurants across 31 countries and two territories under the names Chili’s® Grill & Bar and Maggiano’s Little Italy®. Our Restaurant Support Center is a custom-built, lakefront building located in Cypress Waters – an office, living and retail development in the heart of Dallas-Fort Worth. Every aspect of our campus was designed to encourage personal wellbeing, team-oriented workstyle, and Brinker’s mantra of “Let’s Play Restaurant.” Our favorite features include flexible collaboration spaces, state-of-the-art test kitchen, a game room stocked with modern and nostalgic games, fitness center catering to individual and group workouts, and an inviting community eating and vending area. While the campus is beautiful, Brinker’s true pride is in our Team Members. In fact, the Restaurant Support Center is proud to have been named one of Dallas' best places to work by the Dallas Business Journal and The Dallas Morning News for three consecutive years!

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 34,178
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Jack in the Box

9357 Spectrum Center Blvd, None, San Diego, California, US, 92123
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Jack in the Box has always been the place for those who live outside the box. Where you can try new things and order what you want when you want it. Now, let’s get to the facts! Did you know Jack in the Box was founded on February 21, 1951, by a businessman named Robert O. Peterson in San Diego, California? Yeah, you probably did. Did you know Jack in the Box pioneered a number of firsts in the quick-serve industry, including menu items that are now staples on most fast-food menu boards, like the breakfast sandwich and portable salads. Sure. Did you know Jack in the Box has over 2000 locations? Everyone knows that. Whatever the reason you came to Jack in the Box's LinkedIn page...welcome, we’re happy to have you here.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 23,896
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brinker-international.jpeg
Brinker International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jack-in-the-box.jpeg
Jack in the Box
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Brinker International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jack in the Box
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brinker International in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jack in the Box in 2025.

Incident History — Brinker International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brinker International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jack in the Box (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jack in the Box cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brinker-international.jpeg
Brinker International
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jack-in-the-box.jpeg
Jack in the Box
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Brinker International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jack in the Box company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Brinker International and Jack in the Box have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Jack in the Box company and Brinker International company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jack in the Box company nor Brinker International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Jack in the Box company and Brinker International company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Jack in the Box company nor Brinker International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Brinker International company nor Jack in the Box company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Brinker International nor Jack in the Box holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Brinker International company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jack in the Box company.

Brinker International company employs more people globally than Jack in the Box company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Brinker International nor Jack in the Box holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Brinker International nor Jack in the Box holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Brinker International nor Jack in the Box holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Brinker International nor Jack in the Box holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Brinker International nor Jack in the Box holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Brinker International nor Jack in the Box holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H