Comparison Overview
Brilleland

Brilleland
Eyvind Lyches Vei 19A, Sandvika, Akershus, NO, 1338
Last Update: 25/02/2026
I over 40 år har Brilleland vokst til å bli en av Norges ledende optikerkjeder, der lave priser og høy kvalitet går hånd i hånd med høy fagkompetanse. Brilleland er den profesjonelle kjeden for folk flest, med variert og tidsriktig utvalg til lav pris. Hos Brilleland sk...

Aldi UK
Aldi Stores Ltd, Atherstone, CV9 2SQ, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Since arriving in the UK in 1990, we’ve gone on to be one of the biggest (and the highest-paying) supermarkets in the game, with a team of 45,000 colleagues who make Everyday Amazing. We've been crowned the 'Retail Employer of the Year' at the Grocer Gold Awards four t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Brilleland







Aldi UK






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Brilleland in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aldi UK in 2026.
Incident History - Brilleland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Brilleland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aldi UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aldi UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Brilleland

Aldi UK
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.