Bright-sdk vs Airbnb - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Bright SDK

Airbnb

Bright SDK

Tel Aviv, IL

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://bright-sdk.com/

752/1000Fair

As a developer, you know how important it is to monetize your app without annoying your users with ads or payment requests. That's where Bright SDK comes in with its patented monetization solution. Over 100 million users have already opted-in to Bright SDK through hun...

NAICS:5112

NAICS Definition:Software Publishers

Employees:None

Subsidiaries:4

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Airbnb

888 Brannan Street, San Francisco, CA, US, 94103

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

http://airbnb.com

818/1000Good

Airbnb was born in 2007 when two hosts welcomed three guests to their San Francisco home, and has since grown to over 5 million hosts who have welcomed over 2 billion guest arrivals in almost every country across the globe. Every day, hosts offer unique stays, experienc...

NAICS:5112

NAICS Definition:Software Publishers

Employees:67,516

Subsidiaries:4

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Bright SDK

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Airbnb

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright SDK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airbnb in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bright SDK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright SDK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Airbnb (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airbnb cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Bright SDK

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Airbnb

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack

AIR746060225

FAQ

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Bright SDK company and Airbnb company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Bright SDK and Airbnb, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Bright SDK and Airbnb, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bright SDK or Airbnb ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bright SDK or Airbnb ?

Between Bright SDK and Airbnb, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Bright SDK and Airbnb, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES