Comparison Overview

Bright Horizons

VS

KinderCare Learning Companies

Bright Horizons

2 Wells Avenue, Newton, Massachusetts, 02459, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

More than 1,000 top employers trust Bright Horizons® (NYSE: BFAM) for proven solutions that support employees, advance careers, and maximize performance. From on-site child care that amplify your culture, back-up care to handle disruptions, and education programs that build critical skills, our services help you achieve more. Find more at brighthorizons.com/at-work.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 13,444
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KinderCare Learning Companies

5005 Meadows Rd, Suite 200, Lake Oswego, OR, US, 97035
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Transform lives—including yours—with the nation’s leading provider of early childhood education and child care. We don’t just hold ourselves to the highest standards; we set new ones. Our accredited programs, talented teachers, and research-based curriculum empower children to explore their limitless potential while giving families the confidence they need to shine at home and work. Explore opportunities across our family of brands—KinderCare® Learning Centers, Champions®, and Crème de la Crème®! We also offer child care solutions that organizations can add to employee benefit packages. And we partner with schools and entire districts to bring extended-day programs to their learning communities, including before- and after-school programs and seasonal break camps. With over 37,000 teachers and staff across more than 2,400 locations in 40 states and Washington, D.C., there’s no limit to what you can achieve here and what we can achieve together. Think competitive, family-friendly benefits, professional development, generous paid time off, and a work-life balance that helps you thrive.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 17,241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-horizons.jpeg
Bright Horizons
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kindercare-learningcompanies.jpeg
KinderCare Learning Companies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bright Horizons
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KinderCare Learning Companies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright Horizons in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KinderCare Learning Companies in 2025.

Incident History — Bright Horizons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright Horizons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KinderCare Learning Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KinderCare Learning Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-horizons.jpeg
Bright Horizons
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kindercare-learningcompanies.jpeg
KinderCare Learning Companies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bright Horizons company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KinderCare Learning Companies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KinderCare Learning Companies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bright Horizons company.

In the current year, KinderCare Learning Companies company and Bright Horizons company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KinderCare Learning Companies company nor Bright Horizons company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KinderCare Learning Companies company nor Bright Horizons company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KinderCare Learning Companies company nor Bright Horizons company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bright Horizons company nor KinderCare Learning Companies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bright Horizons nor KinderCare Learning Companies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bright Horizons company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KinderCare Learning Companies company.

KinderCare Learning Companies company employs more people globally than Bright Horizons company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither Bright Horizons nor KinderCare Learning Companies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bright Horizons nor KinderCare Learning Companies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bright Horizons nor KinderCare Learning Companies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bright Horizons nor KinderCare Learning Companies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bright Horizons nor KinderCare Learning Companies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bright Horizons nor KinderCare Learning Companies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H