Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brigham and Women's HospitalBrigham and Women's Hospital
VS
Medical University of South CarolinaMedical University of South Carolina
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Brigham and Women's Hospital

US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) is an international leader in virtually every area of medicine and has been the site of pioneering breakthroughs that have improved lives around the world. A major teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School, BWH has a legacy ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:15,364
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Medical University of South Carolina

Medical University of South Carolina

45 Courtenay Drive,, MSC 203, Charleston, sc, US, 29425

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.musc.edu
783/1000Fair

The Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) is a public institution of higher learning the purpose of which is to preserve and optimize human life in South Carolina and beyond. The university provides an interprofessional environment for learning and discovery thro...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:15,335
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Brigham and Women's Hospital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Medical University of South Carolina

Medical University of South Carolina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brigham and Women's Hospital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical University of South Carolina in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brigham and Women's Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brigham and Women's Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Medical University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Medical University of South Carolina

Medical University of South Carolina

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital company and Medical University of South Carolina company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital and Medical University of South Carolina, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital and Medical University of South Carolina, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brigham and Women's Hospital or Medical University of South Carolina ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brigham and Women's Hospital or Medical University of South Carolina ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital and Medical University of South Carolina, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brigham and Women's Hospital and Medical University of South Carolina, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2