Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bridgeway Benefit TechnologiesBridgeway Benefit Technologies
VS
bigbasketbigbasket
Bridgeway Benefit Technologies

Bridgeway Benefit Technologies

United States, US

Last Update: 27/07/2026

View Profile
678/1000Weak

Bridgeway Benefit Technologies is the foremost provider for multiemployer benefits administration technology solutions. With the strength of our BASYS and ISSI platforms, we offer greater choice, enhanced capabilities and unmatched service delivery built for data securi...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:313
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
bigbasket

bigbasket

Fairway Business Park, Embassy Golf Links Road, Challaghatta, Bangalore, 560071, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bigbasket.com
787/1000Fair

Starting our journey in 2011, today, bigbasket - a Tata Enterprise is India’s largest online supermarket with over 13 million customers and a presence in 60+ cities & towns. With our presence spanning the entire spectrum of consumer needs, we operate through a range of ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:20,685
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bridgeway Benefit Technologies

Bridgeway Benefit Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
bigbasket

bigbasket

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Bridgeway Benefit Technologies has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for bigbasket in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bridgeway Benefit Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgeway Benefit Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - bigbasket (X = Date, Y = Severity)

bigbasket cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bridgeway Benefit Technologies

Bridgeway Benefit Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRI1785176831
bigbasket

bigbasket

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies company and bigbasket company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies and bigbasket, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies and bigbasket, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bridgeway Benefit Technologies or bigbasket ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bridgeway Benefit Technologies or bigbasket ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies and bigbasket, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bridgeway Benefit Technologies and bigbasket, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9