Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech CompanyBridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company
VS
VeoliaVeolia
BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company

BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company

20201 SW Birch Street, Newport Beach, 92660, US

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bridgenet.us/
750/1000Fair

BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company, is an industry leader in the software and service based solutions for noise, the environment and airspace design. With more than two decades of experience and original software solutions, the company identifies problems pre...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:19
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Veolia

Veolia

30, Rue Madeleine Vionnet, Aubervilliers, Île-de-France, FR, 93300

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.veolia.com/en/
799/1000Fair

Veolia group aims to be the benchmark company for ecological transformation. With nearly 220,000 employees worldwide, the Group designs and provides game-changing solutions that are both useful and practical for water, waste and energy management. Through its three comp...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:47,800
Subsidiaries:72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company

BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Veolia

Veolia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veolia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Veolia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veolia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company

BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Veolia

Veolia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company company and Veolia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company and Veolia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company and Veolia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company or Veolia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company or Veolia ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company and Veolia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BridgeNet International, A Tetra Tech Company and Veolia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1