Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)
VS
MediaMarktSaturnMediaMarktSaturn
Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)

Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)

Carrer la Selva, 10, El Prat de Llobregat, 08820, ES

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bricodepot.es
775/1000Fair

“Our commitment is to make your home improvement wishes come true, thanks to our attractive prices policy, to our huge STOCK always available and our customer service.” WE ARE BRICO DEPOT Brico Depôt’s brand owns to Kingfisher group, which is the leader in the DIY...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,062
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MediaMarktSaturn

MediaMarktSaturn

Wankelstr. 5, Ingolstadt, Bavaria, DE, 85049

Last Update: 18/09/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

MediaMarktSaturn Retail Group is Europe's leading retailer of consumer electronics and related services. As part of its strategic realignment, the company is evolving from a traditional product retailer to a solution-oriented omnichannel platform that integrates custome...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,120
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)

Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MediaMarktSaturn

MediaMarktSaturn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MediaMarktSaturn in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MediaMarktSaturn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MediaMarktSaturn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)

Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MediaMarktSaturn

MediaMarktSaturn

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) company and MediaMarktSaturn company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) and MediaMarktSaturn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) and MediaMarktSaturn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) or MediaMarktSaturn ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) or MediaMarktSaturn ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) and MediaMarktSaturn, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brico Depôt Iberia (Grupo Kingfisher) and MediaMarktSaturn, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94094
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in OpenClaw up to 2026.9.5. Affected is the function createCanvasHostHandler of the file extensions/canvas/src/host/server.ts of the component Canvas Host Route. Executing a manipulation can lead to denial of service. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Fix suggestion's "streaming/size-limit" was never shipped - latest 2026.9.5 still buffers the whole file via readFile() (src/canvas/serve.runtime.ts:17,114), unlike the sibling WS path which caps at 64KB. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-94093
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in DLR-RM stable-baselines3 up to 2.9.0. This affects the function PPO.load/load_replay_buffer/VecNormalize.load of the file save_util.py. Such manipulation leads to deserialization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. In v2.9.0 the PyTorch tensor load path is hardened (weights_only=True), but that hardening was later reverted on master via PR #1913 "Hotfix: revert loading with weights_only=True" [blocked] to fix PyTorch 1.13 compat - so even the one "safe" path is inconsistent across versions. #2281 was closed as a duplicate of #1831 since both are unsafe pickle deserialization - but #1831's fix (PR #41) only gated the Hugging Face Hub loader in the separate huggingface_sb3 package. This finding covers the core stable_baselines3 load APIs (PPO.load, load_replay_buffer, VecNormalize.load), which have no safe mode or gate and remained exploitable in v2.9.0 until the outstanding hardening (PR #2264) ships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-94092
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in dmlc dgl up to 2.1.0. This impacts the function load_info/_read_torch_data of the file utils.py. Performing a manipulation of the argument path results in deserialization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94091
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in piskvorky gensim up to 4.4.0. The impacted element is the function Load of the file gensim/utils.py of the component Model Loader. This manipulation of the argument fname causes deserialization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Maintainer closed #3663 same-day with no comment, PR, or fix; repo's last push (2025-11-01) predates the report, so the unsafe pickle.load in SaveLoad.load remains unguarded at develop HEAD.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94090
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in JusticeRage Manalyze 1.0.0. The affected element is the function PE::_parse_debug of the file manape/pe.cpp of the component PE Parser. The manipulation of the argument misc.Length results in integer underflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The patch is identified as 3e299685759f4f767088871de58c5d07f98ee382. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8