Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BRICO DÉPÔTBRICO DÉPÔT
VS
MonoprixMonoprix
BRICO DÉPÔT

BRICO DÉPÔT

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, FR

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Avec 115 dépôts en France dont 1 franchise, 28 dépôts en Espagne, 2 au Portugal et 8 en Roumanie, Brico Dépôt est, depuis plus de 20 ans, un acteur de référence de la rénovation de l’habitat et du bricolage. Brico Dépôt s'affirme comme l'enseigne partenaire de ceux qui ...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:5,502
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Monoprix

Monoprix

FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Faire que chaque jour soit différent, étonnant, prometteur… C’est tout l’esprit du groupe Monoprix. Commerçant de centre-ville depuis 80 ans, Monoprix propose chaque jour une offre innovante et variée de produits et services partageant le même objectif : rendre le be...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:11,320
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BRICO DÉPÔT

BRICO DÉPÔT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Monoprix

Monoprix

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BRICO DÉPÔT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monoprix in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BRICO DÉPÔT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BRICO DÉPÔT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Monoprix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monoprix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BRICO DÉPÔT

BRICO DÉPÔT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Monoprix

Monoprix

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Monoprix company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Monoprix, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Monoprix, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BRICO DÉPÔT or Monoprix ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BRICO DÉPÔT or Monoprix ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Monoprix, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Monoprix, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8