Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BRICO DÉPÔTBRICO DÉPÔT
VS
NextNext
BRICO DÉPÔT

BRICO DÉPÔT

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, FR

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Avec 115 dépôts en France dont 1 franchise, 28 dépôts en Espagne, 2 au Portugal et 8 en Roumanie, Brico Dépôt est, depuis plus de 20 ans, un acteur de référence de la rénovation de l’habitat et du bricolage. Brico Dépôt s'affirme comme l'enseigne partenaire de ceux qui ...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:5,502
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Next

Next

Enderby, Leicester, Leicestershire, GB, LE19 4AT

Last Update: 05/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://careers.next.co.uk/
811/1000Good

At Next we never underestimate what we can do. Bring your energy, play to your strengths and never shy away from change. Push yourself and back others. Make things happen that will be bigger and better than before. Come and work for one of the UK’s biggest retailers. ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:25,463
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BRICO DÉPÔT

BRICO DÉPÔT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Next

Next

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BRICO DÉPÔT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Next in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BRICO DÉPÔT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BRICO DÉPÔT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Next (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Next cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BRICO DÉPÔT

BRICO DÉPÔT

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Next

Next

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT company and Next company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Next, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Next, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BRICO DÉPÔT or Next ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BRICO DÉPÔT or Next ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Next, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BRICO DÉPÔT and Next, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1