Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bricker & Eckler LLPBricker & Eckler LLP
VS
KeraltyKeralty
Bricker & Eckler LLP

Bricker & Eckler LLP

N/A

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.qmcg.com
803/1000Good

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:77
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Keralty

Keralty

Calle 100 # 11b -67, Bogota, 110111, CO

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.keralty.com
785/1000Fair

Anteriormente Organización Sanitas Internacional, Keralty es un grupo empresarial de valor en salud, con más de 40 años de experiencia conformado por empresas de aseguramiento y prestación de servicios de salud y una red propia hospitalaria y asistencial. También form...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:13,878
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bricker & Eckler LLP

Bricker & Eckler LLP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Keralty

Keralty

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bricker & Eckler LLP in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keralty in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bricker & Eckler LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bricker & Eckler LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Keralty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keralty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bricker & Eckler LLP

Bricker & Eckler LLP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRI221072525
Keralty

Keralty

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP company and Keralty company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP and Keralty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP and Keralty, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bricker & Eckler LLP or Keralty ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bricker & Eckler LLP or Keralty ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP and Keralty, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bricker & Eckler LLP and Keralty, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3