Comparison Overview
BRED Banque Populaire

BRED Banque Populaire
18 Quai de la Rapée, Paris, 75012, FR
Last Update: 27/02/2026
BRED is a cooperative people’s bank, supported by its 200,000 members, €5.0bn in equity and 6,000 employees, 25 % of whom work outside mainland France and the French Overseas Departments. It operates in the Greater Paris region, Normandy and in the French Overseas Depar...

VakıfBank
İstanbul, 34415, TR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
1954 yılında, vakıf kaynaklarını ekonomik kalkınmanın gereksinimleri doğrultusunda en iyi biçimde değerlendirmek amacıyla kurulan VakıfBank, o günden bu yana çağdaş bankacılık yöntemleri ve uygulamalarıyla Türkiye’nin tasarruf düzeyinin gelişim sürecine katkıda bulunmak...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BRED Banque Populaire







VakıfBank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BRED Banque Populaire in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VakıfBank in 2026.
Incident History - BRED Banque Populaire (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BRED Banque Populaire cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VakıfBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VakıfBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BRED Banque Populaire

VakıfBank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.