Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BrandShelter DACHBrandShelter DACH
VS
BinanceBinance
BrandShelter DACH

BrandShelter DACH

Kaiserstraße 172-174, St.Ingbert, 66386 , DE

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

BrandShelter ist eine Marke der Brand Services der Team Internet Group PLC, einem der weltweit größten Domain-Management-Unternehmen. BrandShelter ist spezialisiert auf die Bereitstellung von Online-Markenschutzlösungen für Unternehmen und Markeninhaber. Neben dem Onli...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Binance

Binance

Everywhere, 0, OO

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.binance.com/
478/1000Critical

Binance is the world’s leading blockchain ecosystem and cryptocurrency infrastructure provider with a product suite that includes the world's largest digital asset exchange and much more. Trusted by over 200 millions of users worldwide, the Binance platform is dedicate...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,525
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BrandShelter DACH

BrandShelter DACH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Binance

Binance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BrandShelter DACH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

Binance has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BrandShelter DACH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BrandShelter DACH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Binance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Binance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BrandShelter DACH

BrandShelter DACH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Binance

Binance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NETFACTIKBINONLMICAPPCONGOV1769182444
🔒 Incident : Breach
YAHFACTIKNETMICONLBINCAN1769189638
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BIN1766986758

FAQ

Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BrandShelter DACH company and Binance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BrandShelter DACH and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BrandShelter DACH and Binance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BrandShelter DACH or Binance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BrandShelter DACH or Binance ?
Between BrandShelter DACH and Binance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BrandShelter DACH and Binance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA