Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Brand FactoryBrand Factory
VS
Post Office LtdPost Office Ltd
Brand Factory

Brand Factory

Future Lifestyle Fashions Ltd., mumbai, maharashtra, 400060, IN

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Brand Factory, a Future Group concept, is India’s leading chain of fashion discount stores that promises consumers a revolutionary discount shopping experience. Brand Factory offers more than 200 Indian and International brands at 20%-70% discount, 365 days a year. Bran...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:688
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Post Office Ltd

Post Office Ltd

100 Wood Street, London, EC2V 7ER, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.postoffice.co.uk
789/1000Fair

We’ve come a long way since it all started over 380 years ago. We’ve built up a network of 11,500 branches across the country. To give you a sense of how big that is, we’ve got more branches than the four biggest banks in the UK put together. Or put simply, we’re the ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:16,670
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Brand Factory

Brand Factory

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Post Office Ltd

Post Office Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brand Factory in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Post Office Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Brand Factory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brand Factory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Post Office Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Post Office Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Brand Factory

Brand Factory

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Post Office Ltd

Post Office Ltd

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Brand Factory company and Post Office Ltd company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Brand Factory and Post Office Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Brand Factory and Post Office Ltd, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Brand Factory or Post Office Ltd ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Brand Factory or Post Office Ltd ?
Between Brand Factory and Post Office Ltd, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Brand Factory and Post Office Ltd, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1