Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BrainNow Medical Technology LimitedBrainNow Medical Technology Limited
VS
Dentsply SironaDentsply Sirona
BrainNow Medical Technology Limited

BrainNow Medical Technology Limited

UNIT 535A, 5/F, Core Building 2, No. 1 Science Park West Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, N.T., Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, HK, Nil

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
754/1000Fair

The mission of BrainNow is promote brain health by developing and commercializing clinically applicable computer-aided (CAD) software tools for diagnosis of dementia and other neurodegenerative diseases. BrainNow is founded by a local team of doctors and engineers at th...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dentsply Sirona

Dentsply Sirona

13320 Ballantyne Corporate Pl, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28277

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

A Global Total Solutions Provider Dentsply Sirona is the world’s largest manufacturer of professional dental products and technologies, empowering dental professionals to provide better, safer and faster dental care. Our products and solutions include leading position...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,199
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BrainNow Medical Technology Limited

BrainNow Medical Technology Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dentsply Sirona

Dentsply Sirona

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Device Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BrainNow Medical Technology Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Device Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dentsply Sirona in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BrainNow Medical Technology Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BrainNow Medical Technology Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dentsply Sirona (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dentsply Sirona cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BrainNow Medical Technology Limited

BrainNow Medical Technology Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dentsply Sirona

Dentsply Sirona

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited company and Dentsply Sirona company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited and Dentsply Sirona, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited and Dentsply Sirona, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BrainNow Medical Technology Limited or Dentsply Sirona ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BrainNow Medical Technology Limited or Dentsply Sirona ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited and Dentsply Sirona, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BrainNow Medical Technology Limited and Dentsply Sirona, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3