Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Banco Bradesco

Banco Bradesco Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

banco.bradesco

O Bradesco é um dos líderes do setor financeiro privado e um dos maiores empregadores na categoria. Além disso, apresenta o melhor índice de eficiência entre os bancos de varejo. Nossa missão é fornecer soluções, produtos e serviços financeiros e de seguros com agilidade e competência, principalmente por meio da inclusão bancária e da promoção da mobilidade social, contribuindo para o desenvolvimento sustentável e a construção de relacionamentos duradouros. Nós acreditamos nas pessoas. Desde o início de nossas atividades, reconhecemos no valor do desempenho e no potencial realizador das pessoas a base de sustentação dos negócios da Organização Bradesco. Nossa atuação está inserida e se expande continuamente, por todo o


Banco Bradesco A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Banco Bradesco
Company Information
Website:http://banco.bradesco
Employees number:87,598
Number of followers:3,611,421
NAICS:52211
Industry Type:Banking
Homepage:banco.bradesco
Banco Bradesco Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
Banco BradescoBanking
Updated:
02/04/2026
770/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Banco Bradesco Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Banco BradescoBanking
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Banco Bradesco
Banco BradescoFair
Current Score
770Baa (FAIR)
01000
2 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
770Before Incident
MAY 2026
772Before Incident
APRIL 2026
774Before Incident
MARCH 2026
778Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
778Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
769Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
769Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
768Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
767Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
766Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
765Before Incident
JULY 2025
771Before Incident
OCTOBER 2024
782Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Oct 2024Banco Bradesco
MasterCard and Bradesco: Researchers Hijack Hacker Domain Using Name Server Delegation

Infoblox Researchers Hijack Malicious Push Notification Network via DNS Misconfiguration

760After Incident
HIGH-22
MASBRA1769236185
Infoblox Researchers Hijack Malicious Push Notification Network via DNS Misconfiguration Security researchers at Infoblox disrupted a large-scale malicious push notification operation by exploiting a DNS misconfiguration flaw known as "lame nameserver delegation" a technique dubbed "Sitting Ducks." Without directly compromising systems, the team intercepted over 57 million logs in just two weeks, exposing a global scam network targeting victims across 60+ languages with deceptive ads, brand impersonation, and fraudulent content. The operation leveraged abandoned domains misconfigured to use external nameservers lacking proper records allowing researchers to claim them without registration. Within hours, their servers were flooded with unencrypted traffic from victim devices, revealing detailed user metrics, device data, and ad delivery logs. The threat actor’s infrastructure sent duplicate notifications to victims, some of whom received 140+ alerts daily, with subscriptions lasting over a year. Key Findings: - Scale & Impact: The network delivered 52 million ads, yielding only 630 clicks (a 0.0012% click-through rate) and an estimated $350 daily revenue from monitored domains. - Targets: 50% of traffic focused on South Asia, particularly Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan. - Impersonation: Ads mimicked financial institutions like Bradesco, Sparkasse, MasterCard, Touch ‘n Go, and GCash, alongside fake security alerts and adult content. - Technique: The "Sitting Ducks" flaw previously used by groups like Vacant Viper enabled domain hijacking via traffic distribution systems (e.g., 404TDS), turning dormant domains into malware distribution hubs. The research underscores the risks of unmaintained DNS configurations, where abandoned domains become repeat targets for malicious campaigns. Organizations were urged to audit nameserver delegations to prevent similar exploits.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
DNS Misconfiguration Exploitation
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (ad fraud, brand impersonation)
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $350 daily revenue (estimated from monitored domains)Data Compromised: User metrics, device data, ad delivery logs (unencrypted)Systems Affected: Victim devices receiving malicious push notificationsOperational Impact: Disruption of malicious push notification network by researchersConversion Rate Impact: 0.0012% click-through rate (630 clicks from 52 million ads)Brand Reputation Impact: Brand impersonation (Bradesco, Sparkasse, MasterCard, Touch ‘n Go, GCash)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: User metrics, device data, ad delivery logsNumber Of Records Exposed: 57 million+ logsSensitivity Of Data: Low to medium (no PII explicitly mentioned)Data Encryption: Unencrypted traffic intercepted
JULY 2023
814Before Incident
Breach
11 Jul 2023Banco Bradesco
Bradesco Securities, Inc.

Bradesco Securities, Inc. Data Breach (2023)

771After Incident
HIGH-43
BRA734082025
The Vermont Office of the Attorney General disclosed a data breach affecting Bradesco Securities, Inc. on July 28, 2023, after detecting unauthorized access to its systems on July 11, 2023. The incident involved the compromise of sensitive employee information, specifically Social Security numbers (SSNs) and state identification numbers. While the exact number of impacted individuals remains undisclosed, the breach poses significant risks, including potential identity theft, financial fraud, or targeted phishing attacks against employees. The exposure of such highly sensitive data underscores vulnerabilities in the company’s cybersecurity defenses, particularly in safeguarding personally identifiable information (PII). Given the nature of the stolen data, affected employees may face long-term repercussions, including credit score damage, unauthorized account openings, or misuse of their identities for illicit activities. The breach also raises concerns about internal security protocols, as the unauthorized access went undetected for an unspecified period before discovery.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
Social Security numbersstate identification numbersIdentity Theft Risk: High (SSNs and state IDs exposed)
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable Information (PII)Number Of Records Exposed: UnknownSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: Likely (unauthorized access confirmed)Social Security numbersstate identification numbers

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Banco Bradesco ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Banco Bradesco's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Banco Bradesco ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Banco Bradesco's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?