Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BRAC-AarongBRAC-Aarong
VS
TescoTesco
BRAC-Aarong

BRAC-Aarong

346 Tejgaon Industrial Area, Dhaka, undefined, 1208, BD

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aarong.com
769/1000Fair

Aarong is Bangladesh’s most popular lifestyle retail chain. This ethical brand began in 1978 as a humble means to empower rural artisans to rise above poverty. Today, with 28 retail stores across Bangladesh and over 100 fashion and lifestyle product lines, Aarong suppor...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:2,032
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tesco

Tesco

Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1GA, GB

Last Update: 12/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tescoplc.com
747/1000Moderate

One of the world’s largest retailers of consumer goods from food to fashion. Serving our customers, communities and planet a little better every day in our stores and online is at the heart of everything we do. Founded in 1919 by Jack Cohen using the £30 he received on...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:86,468
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BRAC-Aarong

BRAC-Aarong

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tesco

Tesco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BRAC-Aarong in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Tesco has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - BRAC-Aarong (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BRAC-Aarong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tesco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tesco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BRAC-Aarong

BRAC-Aarong

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tesco

Tesco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AST-TESHE1773679185
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PETBLATOT-TE1770804130
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARCALWAISAITOYTHEMORPET-TE1772023906

FAQ

Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BRAC-Aarong company and Tesco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BRAC-Aarong and Tesco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BRAC-Aarong and Tesco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BRAC-Aarong or Tesco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BRAC-Aarong or Tesco ?
Between BRAC-Aarong and Tesco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BRAC-Aarong and Tesco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9