Comparison Overview
BPM LLP

BPM LLP
One California Street, Suite 2500, San Francisco, CA, US, 94111
Last Update: 07/03/2026
Hi there, we're BPM! Welcome to a community built on connection, collaboration, and care. With a global team of more than 1,200 professionals working across industries and time zones, we’re here to help you succeed — in work and in life. Recognized as a premier prov...

Acosta Group
6600 Corporate Center Pkwy, Jacksonville, 32216, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Acosta Group fuses storied expertise, unmatched connectivity and advanced insight to accelerate brand growth – everywhere you sell. Our collective of the most trusted retail, marketing and foodservice agencies is reimagining how people connect with brands at every point...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

BPM LLP







Acosta Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BPM LLP in 2026.
Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Acosta Group in 2026.
Incident History - BPM LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BPM LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Acosta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Acosta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

BPM LLP

Acosta Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.