Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BPI group | LHHBPI group | LHH
VS
PaychexPaychex
BPI group | LHH

BPI group | LHH

37, rue du Rocher, 75008 Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, 75008, FR

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lhh.com/fr/fr
754/1000Fair

READY FOR NEXT - Depuis 50 ans. BPI group | LHH en France. 750 consultants.100 bureaux. 1 500 projets engagés chaque année. Au cœur du réseau LHH Monde. Grâce à la complémentarité de ses métiers, BPI group répond aux enjeux et besoins des entreprises de toute taille e...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:467
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Paychex

Paychex

911 Panorama Trail South, Rochester, 14625, US

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.paychex.com/
746/1000Moderate

As the future of work continues to evolve, Paychex leads the way by making complex HR, payroll, and benefits brilliantly simple. Our unique combination of digital HR technology and advisory solutions meets the changing needs of employers and their employees. You can see...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:18,562
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BPI group | LHH

BPI group | LHH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Paychex

Paychex

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BPI group | LHH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paychex in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BPI group | LHH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BPI group | LHH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Paychex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paychex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BPI group | LHH

BPI group | LHH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Paychex

Paychex

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY1792317102325
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAY406072525

FAQ

Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BPI group | LHH company and Paychex company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BPI group | LHH and Paychex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BPI group | LHH and Paychex, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BPI group | LHH or Paychex ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BPI group | LHH or Paychex ?
Between BPI group | LHH and Paychex, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BPI group | LHH and Paychex, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA