Comparison Overview
Bow River Capital
Bow River Capital
205 Detroit St, None, Denver, Colorado, US, 80206
Last Update: 18/12/2025
About Bow River Capital Bow River Capital is a private alternative asset management company based in Denver, Colorado, focused on investing in the lower middle market in three asset classes, including private equity, real estate, and software growth equity. In addition...
Ackermans & van Haaren
Begijnenvest 113 Antwerp, 2000, BE
Last Update: 17/09/2026
Ackermans & van Haaren is a diversified group active in 4 core sectors: Marine Engineering & Contracting (DEME, one of the largest dredging companies in the world - CFE, a construction group with headquarters in Belgium), Private Banking (Delen Private Bank, one of the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Bow River Capital
Ackermans & van Haaren
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bow River Capital in 2026.
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ackermans & van Haaren in 2026.
Incident History - Bow River Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bow River Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ackermans & van Haaren (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ackermans & van Haaren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Bow River Capital
Ackermans & van Haaren
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.